Toying with Genocide

American Digest

1. The Most Dangerous Game

LURKING BENEATH OUR INTERNAL ARGUMENT concerning the relentless
demographic expansion of Islam into the West without assimilation, is
the persistent background question, "Oh, my, whatever shall WE do with
THEM?"

WE are, you see, like muddlers and fiddlers since Nero, worried
about THEM. Our doltish conservative muddlers and fiddlers worry about
what "THEY will do to US" if we aren't very, very careful and selective
about which of THEM we capture or kill while WE seek to give THEM the
"gifts" of freedom and democracy. Our brave new fiddlers on the Left
fiddle about worrying if THEY have enough to eat, enough to wear,
enough respect, enough, in short, of the love THEY deserve for not
killing US today.

Both bumbling groups may differ in the focus of their fretting, but
fret they do. For the problem, as they have defined it, has to do with
what is commonly stated as 'a statistically small group of Muslims
around the world' who need to be dealt with in some manner so that
greater Islam can get on with the historic task of being "a religion of
peace and understanding." The majority of both camps of muddlers and
fiddlers agree on this one thing: It isn't Islam that's the problem,
just a few heretics that have gotten out of hand in their zeal to obey
the will of God, and, hey, who hasn't done that from time to time?

One solution, commonly referenced as "the Left/Liberal" position is
essentially "leave them alone and they'll come home. They know its for
their own good." The other solution, "the Right/Conservative" position,
is to force assimilation, modernization, reformation and democratic
mechanisms upon Islam "for its own good."

powered by performancing firefox